John Rush and Steve House take a deep dive into the many factors of Covid and how the Biden Administration is using this to control social media and unlawfully claim that an emergency use authorization vaccination is safe.
Jen Psaki just said “We’re flagging problematic posts for Facebook that spread disinformation.” Should be terrifying to anyone who values free speech. Big tech companies are now default state actors. pic.twitter.com/xOosfhuF2y
— Clay Travis (@ClayTravis) July 15, 2021
Overall what we are witnessing is what the North Koreans, Chinese, and Russian governments do to their people. This is what happens in those countries, not the United States. It looks like the Chinese game system of social scoring is coming to America. As a citizen, you get a score.
The Biden Administration is pushing a war with the American people and it’s escalating very rapidly. This huge control factor is being pushed by the powers that be. And in this case, it’s the White House and the folks that are on the far left.
An excerpt from John and Steve’s Commentary
John: And, Steve, I’m just confused as to why we, as a populist have given them this much power and why we haven’t resisted before. Now there’s still very little resistance out there.
Steve: Yeah, I know. And this was a very big topic of conversation over the weekend because I was actually in a spiritual setting talking to some folks who are just good Christians like I am. And everybody came back with sort of the same conclusion, which is, we’re trying to be told not to fight because fighting is politically incorrect. So you take away in the Christian sense, you take away onward Christian soldier. You take away, battle hymn of the Republic. You don’t sing those songs anymore because they’re an implication that there’s evil in the world and you have to fight it. What you’re really supposed to do is be quiet and go along and not rock the boat. And we’ve got people who are fact-checking us, who are clearly biased in what they’re doing. It’s time to fight it’s long past time to fight. And if we don’t do it, we’re going to get stuff that we never even dreamed.
John: Yet when did it become? Because I don’t know the answer to this Steve, when did it become acceptable in Christian circles and conservative circles to literally stop fighting for fear that we would be labeled some sort of a whack job or somebody that’s way out there on their beliefs or what have you when, in fact, I can go all the way back in time, even when Christ walked this Earth and there wasn’t anything about Jesus Christ himself that wasn’t polarizing. He was, at the time, the most polarizing individual on the planet, and in a lot of ways started the ruckus Himself. He did that in the temple. There was nothing mealy-mouth about this guy whatsoever. And yet, as a Church were the opposite of that today.
Sign up: https://www.prodigyconsultinggroupllc.org/contact Tuesday, July 20th, 7 PM at the Lakewood Cultural Center. If You are interested in testifying, we will train you on how to testify, and then you will testify in person on Tuesday. This is not in conjunction with or authorized by any Candidate or Candidates Committee.
Laurel Imer for Congress Events:
https://LaurelImerForCongress.com/events The Campaign will be bringing out Sherriff Mark Lamb from Pinal County Arizona on July 30th and 31st. If You are interested in attending either of those events sign up for the event on our website today.
Weston D. Imer Founder and CEO Prodigy Consulting Group, LLC O: (202) 849-7530
Has Human Nature Evolved? If not, What Difference Does it Make In Our Lives?
Listen to the full interview here as John and Richard V. Battle connect the dots between moral relativism, the Bible, and the US Constitution.
Intellectuals pronounce man’s improvements because they are essential to the adoption and promotion of moral relativism. Moral relativism is where people get to define their own truth. Moral relativism is the opposite of Biblical truth. Unlike the Bible, it believes that there is no absolute truth.
If humanity has advanced, it is easy to discard ancient principles because they no longer apply to humans who have surpassed their application. However, we can find all of the validation we need about the past, present, and future nature of man in The Bible. This can be done without advocating the Bible’s theology and using its contents as literature because the writers based their stories on how humans behaved. It is easy to see that we have grown technologically but our behaviors have stayed the same.
Those who argue man has and is evolving is discounting history
3 Examples Avoiding responsibility – Adam, Eve and the Serpent Ask any young child what happened when something breaks, and they instinctively, without hesitation, state, “I didn’t do it.” Our natural reaction is to avoid responsibility.
Jealousy and envy – Cain killing Abel and Jacob stealing Esau’s birthright and inheritance Wouldn’t we learn over time the useless energy and money wasted feeling jealousy and envy? Human’s natural instinct contains covetousness for what we don’t have instead of gratitude for what we do have.
Ambition – David and Bathseba How often do we see today stories of people who have virtually everything but destroy their and others’ lives to obtain something they do not control?
If hindsight is 20-20, and experience is the best teacher, why won’t the people who have neither listen to the people who have both?
The planet is improving, not in spite of increasing CO2 and rising temperature, but because of it. The very framework of the climate-catastrophe argument is being confronted with scientific facts.
“I talked earlier today about what’s coming out now, finally, as this overpopulation bomb and the fact that that’s been dispelled and the reality is that never came to fruition. And it was really one of the biggest lies foisted upon mankind. And what I said, Gregory, was climate change, global warming, whatever you want to call it, I believe down the road is going to be in the same situation.” ~ John Rush
“Oh, absolutely. And if we look at, I mean, I look at, I’m a geologist, so I look at the big picture and we’re being told, aren’t we, that “Oh, my God. We can’t let it get a degree and a half or two degrees warmer or there’s going to be famine.” Right? Nasty population. Everything imaginable is going to go wrong. Well as a geologist, Again, I look back. What’s happened over the last five or 6,000 years since the first-grade civilizations arose. What happened whenever temperatures got to those levels? Well, I’ll tell you what happened. Humanity and the Euros ecosystem thrived. Food was abundant with great abundance during periods that were warmer than today.” – Gregory Wrightstone
CLIMATE CHANGE ANALYST: Gregory Wrightstone, is a geologist and the Executive Director of the CO2 Coalition in Arlington Virginia. He is the bestselling author of the book “Inconvenient Facts: The Science That Al Gore Doesn’t Want You to Know.”
BIO: Gregory Wrightstone is a geologist with more than 35 years of studying the Earth’s processes. He earned a bachelor’s degree from Waynesburg University and a master’s from West Virginia University, both in the field of geology. He has presented the results of his research around the world, including India, Ireland, and China.
Gregory’s book was the result of a quest for the truth about climate change — a subject uncritically reported by the mainstream media of an Earth lurching inexorably toward climate apocalypse. Contrary to the hyperbole of climate alarmists, Wrightstone’s review of the science provides the historical context of the Earth that shows clearly that rising temperatures and increasing carbon dioxide are benefiting both the planet and the human condition.
“This is out of The American Spectator. But they pulled some things even out of The Wall Street Journal. And the reality is, I could really say this, probably in one sentence. It never happened, folks. There never was an overpopulation of the Earth.
In fact, we have now entered into a day and age where there is a lot of countries, including the likes of China, where they’re looking at their own population, saying, wait a minute. We don’t have enough young people running around to really meet the demand of what we as a country and economy need moving forward.” – John Rush
The greatest environmental demographic scare of the second half of the century, overpopulation is now officially conceded to have been a monumental fraud.
To appreciate what an embarrassing reversal this is for the Green movement. Consider that 40 to 50 years ago, nearly all the scientists, policymakers, Us government agencies, and experts at the UN told us that a rampaging population growth would lead to the doomsday with the world in our lifetime running out of food, energy, and nearly everything else.
Does this sound familiar, folks? Does this sound a lot like global warming, climate change, where you have, quote, Unquote, all of the experts, including the government and the UN, believing that if we don’t do something, that the existential threat right now, the largest crisis you’ve heard Joe Biden and his crony say this, the biggest threat we have in the world today is climate change. Does it not sound eerily familiar to overpopulation?
“The New York Times put the point even more emphatically in its coverage of this amazing twist of fate by acknowledging in a headline that the dreaded population bomb of the 1960s and ’70s has turned into a global population bust. Folks, the reason why I’m reading this to you is because these are things that I’ve talked about on this program now off and on for the past seven years.” ~ John Rush